Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. National Mobile Television

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2005No. 3:03 CV 836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MUNLEY, District Judge.

Presently before the court are Defendant National Mobile Television’s (“NMT”) summary judgment-motion and Defendant IBEW Local Union No. 45’s (“IBEW”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Additionally, NMT has filed two motions to strike in response to the evidence presented by Plaintiff James M. Fitzpatrick (“Plaintiff’) in opposition to its motion for summary judgment. These matters have been fully briefed and argued, and therefore- are ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, we will grant NMT’s motion to strike in part, and grant…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeCicco v. Mid-Atlantic Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Smith v. Township of East GreenwichDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  3. Cobetto v. Wyeth PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Carter v. Mid-Atlantic Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. ANGELINI v. U.S. FACILITIES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API