Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1992No. C6-91-1519PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Orlando C. Clark challenges his convictions of third degree burglary, fleeing a peace officer, driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .10 or more. Clark contends that he was denied a fair trial because of a trial court ruling that, if he testified, he could be impeached with a prior conviction and because two police officers’ testimony allegedly implied Clark had a prior criminal record. Clark also argues that his sentence for the fleeing a peace officer conviction should be vacated because it arose out of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. State v. BettinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State of Minnesota v. Abe Joseph BousheeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. Arthur Charles HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. Asa James KingsburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Minnesota v. Damian MataCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API