Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1983No. C3-82-921PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal that comes to this court not directly but by way of appeal from the denial of postconviction relief. Unlike most of the appeals that we have had from the denial of postconviction relief, this one, like Davis v. State, 324 N.W.2d 802 (1982), is not by a petitioner seeking retroactive application of the Sentencing Guidelines but by a petitioner who committed his crime after May 1, 1980, and was sentenced pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines. The issue is whether a dispositional and a durational departure were justified. We hold that a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Bixby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API