Brainerd v. State
New York Court of Claims
Claim against the State of ¡New York for compensation for lands taken for the Barge canal.
1Opinion of the CourtBodeitbeok, J.
The claimants were the owners of a parcel of land in the village of Spencerport, Monroe county, ÜST. Y., situate on the south side of the Erie canal, having a frontage on the berm bank of 341.26 feet. There were located upon the premises a cabbage storehouse of frost proof construction having a capacity of 300 tons, a fertilizer house having a capacity of 150 tons, coal sheds and track capacity of 1,000 tons, a cooper shop and a barrel storage house. The'canal runs east and west at this point, and the cooper shop and storehouse were at the south end of the property away from the canal, while…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- American Woolen Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- State Highway Commission v. NunesOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Keller v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- City of Buffalo v. StrozziNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. LarwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.