Legal Opinion

Keller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1917No. 8875PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Montrose District Court, Eon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

F. H. Miller, plaintiff below, instituted proceedings under, the Eminent Domain Act to condemn a right of way *305for a drain ditch upon the land of Lina Keller, defendant below. The land on which this right of way is located will be hereinafter referred to as the Keller north forty.

The defendant filed a cross-petition alleging, in substance, that she is also the owner of the forty acres lying immediately south of the Keller north forty; that a ditch which carries water through plaintiff’s drainage system lies adjacent and contiguous to this south forty, for a distance of a quarter of a mile…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Walker v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. City of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Garnet Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. People v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Johnson v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API