Legal Opinion

Blaw-Knox Co. v. Lederle

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1945No. 10081PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner was the defendant in a patent infringement suit brought against it by the Farval Corp. in the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. It is a New Jersey corporation with an established place of business in Cleveland, Ohio, in which state it has an agent designated upon whom service of process may be made under the provisions of Ohio law. It moved for a dismissal of the proceedings on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over it because no act of infringement had been committed in Ohio. At a pre-trial conference held in accordance with Rule 16, Federal Rules…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Bulldog Electric Products Co. v. Cole Electric Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. American Chemical Paint Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. Holub Industries, Inc. v. Charles C. Wyche, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API