Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 22, 1982No. 6061PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

Karl C. Morgan appeals to this court from his conviction and sentence for driving while intoxicated, in violation of AMC 9.28.-020(A). Morgan first contends that the ordinance and the instructions of the court violated his right to due process of law because neither the ordinance nor the instructions specified the intent which was a necessary element of the offense. Morgan filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that the ordinance violated his due process rights by not requiring criminal intent. This motion was denied by the court. At trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nukapigak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Huckaby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Neitzel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API