Legal Opinion
United States v. Krogh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 15, 1973No. Crim. 857-73PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GESELL, District Judge.
Pretrial motions of defendant having been briefed and fully argued and testimony taken, the Court after due consideration, enters the following rulings.(1) The motion to dismiss is denied.
The sworn deposition taken in the offices of an Assistant Attorney General was a proceeding ancillary to the Watergate Grand Jury inquiry and defendant, a lawyer, was fully informed as to that fact in advance.
As a federal official partly concerned with national security matters, he had no license to testify falsely under oath nor did he have an immunity from prosecution. Barr v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. MoylanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Daniel J. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. David H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. William C. ScrimgeourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- United States v. MazzeiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.