Legal Opinion
United States v. Jaramillo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1995No. 94-10563PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge:
Guillermo JaramiUo appeals his conviction for making false declarations under 18 U.S.C. § 1623(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse.
I
Standard of Review
The district court’s statutory interpretation is reviewed de novo. United States v. Polizzi 801 F.2d 1543, 1547 (9th Cir.1986). A district court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Schmidt, 573 F.2d 1057, 1066 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 881, 99 S.Ct. 221, 58 L.Ed.2d 194 (1978).
II
Background
Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) agents approached AppeUant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. MatrangaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard A. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SavoyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8505, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,675 United States of America v. Guillermo JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MorielDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2002