Legal Opinion

Lindgren v. Berg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. 8308-05244; CA A36918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

The Lindgrens (plaintiffs) brought this action against Berg (defendant) and others for fraud, conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty. Defendant counterclaimed for attorney fees and for damages for breach of contract and fiduciary duty. The trial was lengthy. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs for $1 general and $1 punitive damages on their claim for breach of fiduciary duty, but it returned a verdict for defendant on plaintiffs’ fraud claim. It returned a verdict for defendant for $1 on his counterclaim for breach of contract and $1 general and $5,000 punitive damages on his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kabil Developments Corp. v. MignotOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hansen v. Oregon Humane SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wood v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindgren v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ristau v. Wescold, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Ristau v. Wescold, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API