Hansen v. Oregon Humane Society
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The appellant seeks to construe the third paragraph of the testator’s will so as to render it ineffective on the following grounds: (1) Because it is indefinite and uncertain and therefore void; (2) because the legatee is not definitely designated; (3) because of the alleged release by respondent of the $2,000 legacy.
On the contrary, the respondent contends, first, that. this paragraph of the will is clear, definite and certain and should be complied with, as held by the lower court; second, that the alleged release is void and of no force and effect for the following reasons: (a) because it…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bramwell v. RowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Closset v. BurtchaellOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Thorp v. LundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dean v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Dickerson v. MurfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Town of Cody v. Buffalo Bill Memorial Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Holland's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Heimbigner v. U. S. National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.