Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Deckers

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 4, 2002No. CIV.A.98-787-JJFPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Deck-ers, (D.I.13), and the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Carolyn Hartsky and Defendant City of Wilmington(D.I.16). For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant Defendant Deckers’ motion (D.I.13) and will deny the Hartsky and City of Wilmington motion (D.I.16).

BACKGROUND

According to Plaintiffs Complaint (D.I.2), on March 30, 1995, Plaintiff was arrested by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Wilmington, Delaware on an outstanding fugitive warrant from New…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Smith v. DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  2. Smith v. CarrollDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  3. Dickens v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Torruella-Torres v. FCI Fort DixDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016
  5. Shah v. DanbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API