Legal Opinion
Shah v. Danberg
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 4, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-1182-SLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kushal Kalpan Shah a/k/a Gerron Maurice Lindsey (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, who proceeds pro se and has been granted in forma pauperis status, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 (D.I. 1) The court proceeds to screen the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and § 1915A and will rule on plaintiffs pending motions. For the following reasons, the court will: (1) dismiss all claims, with the exception of the claim challenging the constitutionality…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JOHNSON v. CO 1 LASKODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Shah v. Connections, CSP et, al.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Tusha v. MasciantonioDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023