Legal Opinion
Dickens v. Taylor
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 24, 2009No. Civil Action 04-201-JJFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. (D.I. 144, 149.) State Defendants Tyson, Burris, Holman, Taylor, Howard, En grem, 1 Kromka, Oney, and Jackson, (collectively “Tyson Defendants”) filed a Motion For Summary Judgment. (D.I. 144.) Additionally, State Defendants Evans, Seeord, Sagers, Stanton, Harvey, Rainey, Gardels, Carroll, Cunningham, Burton, Belanger, and Drake, (collectively “Evans Defendants”) filed a Motion For Summary Judgment as well. (D.I. 149.) Plaintiff Kevin L. Dickens opposes both Motions. (D.I. 158,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manuel v. MearsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Davis III v. SpicerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Dwayne Cropper v. Philip D. Parker, Franchot Wallace, Robert MockDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Ronald Jones v. R. KirchenbauerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Rumbo v. American Medical Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2021