Legal Opinion

United States v. James A. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2000No. 99-10094PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

James A. Miller (“Miller”) moved to modify his fíne following his felony conviction, but the district court dismissed Miller’s motion for lack of jurisdiction. In this appeal, Miller argues that-at least where payment of a fine is made an express condition of supervised release-18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) gives the district courts authority to hear such motions. We agree and therefore REVERSE and REMAND.

I. BACKGROUND

Miller-a soldier in the United States Army, stationed in Hawaii-pleaded guilty to one count of transmitting child pornography over the Internet, in violation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Zane MohrbacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Roger LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. HattenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Earl Truss, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. David W. TrenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Matthew Henry WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. CopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Ernest G.M. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API