United States v. James A. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
James A. Miller (“Miller”) moved to modify his fíne following his felony conviction, but the district court dismissed Miller’s motion for lack of jurisdiction. In this appeal, Miller argues that-at least where payment of a fine is made an express condition of supervised release-18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) gives the district courts authority to hear such motions. We agree and therefore REVERSE and REMAND.
I. BACKGROUND
Miller-a soldier in the United States Army, stationed in Hawaii-pleaded guilty to one count of transmitting child pornography over the Internet, in violation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Zane MohrbacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Roger LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. HattenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Earl Truss, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. David W. TrenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Matthew Henry WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ernest G.M. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.