Legal Opinion
United States v. Hatten
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1999No. 97-30788PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge:
In this ease we are asked to determine whether the district court’s order setting a payment schedule for restitution was without jurisdictional basis. We determine that the district court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion and we thus vacate the district court’s order and remand the case with instructions to the district court to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
On February 22, 1994, Stephen F. Hatten (“Hatten”) pled guilty to student loan fraud, 20 U.S.C. § 1097(a), application loan fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1014, and social security fraud, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. CapuaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Billy Ray VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joe Clinton SeglerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Smullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Roger LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Virsnieks v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- John F. Kaminski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. John Herman ThieleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. David MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Tyree Neal, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.