Legal Opinion
United States v. Roger Lussier
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 9, 1997No. 354, Docket 96-1110PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
This appeal concerns the relationship between a district court’s authority to vacate an illegal sentence and its authority to modify the terms of supervised release. The precise issue is whether one component of a sentence — restitution—that was not challenged either on direct review or under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, may nonetheless be modified because restitution was made a condition of supervised release and supervised release may be modified pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2). This issue arises on an appeal by Roger Lussier from the February 8, 1996, order of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Edison JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James A. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Victoria Kaye Johnson, A/K/A Victoria Kaye SouthernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Elvis E. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Burkey v. MarberryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Duane Arthur MyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ahmed AmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Stephen A. BalonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.