Legal Opinion

Enernational Corp. v. Exploitation Engineers, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 30, 1986No. 01-85-0546-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOYT, Justice.

The trial court granted summary judgment against the appellant, Enernational Corporation (“Enernational”), on a sworn account in the amount of $31,991.73, plus post-judgment interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. Enernational filed a general denial and did not respond to the motion for summary judgment of the appellee, Exploitation Engineers, Inc. (“Exploitation”). We affirm.

In three points of error, Enernational contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment because the sworn account was deficient and did not constitute prima facie proof…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Stone Resources, Inc. v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Marketing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sundance Oil Co. v. Aztec Pipe and Supply Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Powers v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Sanders v. Total Heat & Air, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Krchnak v. Fulton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  4. Andrews v. East Texas Medical Center-Athens, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
  5. Loc Thi Nguyen v. Short, How, Frels & Heitz, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API