Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Charles P. White

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2016No. 49S00-1203-DI-156PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Charles P. White, engaged in attorney misconduct. For this misconduct, we conclude that Ré-spóndent should' be suspended from' the practice of law in this state for at least two years without automatic reinstatement.

Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have' submitted for approval a “Statement of Circumstances and' Conditional Agreement for Discipline” "stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline. The Respondent’s 1995 admission to' this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Matter of GutmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Matter of: Thomas R. PhilpotIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of: Harold E. BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API