In the Matter of Charles P. White
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We find that Respondent, Charles P. White, engaged in attorney misconduct. For this misconduct, we conclude that Ré-spóndent should' be suspended from' the practice of law in this state for at least two years without automatic reinstatement.
Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have' submitted for approval a “Statement of Circumstances and' Conditional Agreement for Discipline” "stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline. The Respondent’s 1995 admission to' this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Matter of GutmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- In the Matter of: Thomas R. PhilpotIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of: Harold E. BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 2016