In the Matter of: Thomas R. Philpot
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We find that Respondent, Thomas Phil-pot, engaged in attorney misconduct. For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be suspended from the practice of law in this state for at least four years without automatic reinstatement.
Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have submitted for approval a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline” stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline. The Respondent’s 2001 admission to this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. Thomas PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- In re PhilpotIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of Charles P. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- In the Matter of Raymond GuptaIndiana Supreme Court · 2020
- In the Matter of Theodore Edward RokitaIndiana Supreme Court · 2023
- In the Matter of: Harold E. BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 2016