In the Matter of: Harold E. Bean
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Discipline Action
2Per curiam
We find that Respondent, Harold E. Bean, engaged in attorney misconduct. For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be disbarred.
This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission’s “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action.” Respondent’s 1974 admission to this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s disciplinary jurisdiction. See Ind. Const. art. 7, § 4.
Procedural Background and Facts
Respondent was the elected Clerk-Treasurer of the Town of…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of GutmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- In the Matter of: Thomas R. PhilpotIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- In re BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.