Legal Opinion

In the Matter of: Harold E. Bean

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2016No. 49S00-1601-DI-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Discipline Action

2Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Harold E. Bean, engaged in attorney misconduct. For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be disbarred.

This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission’s “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action.” Respondent’s 1974 admission to this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s disciplinary jurisdiction. See Ind. Const. art. 7, § 4.

Procedural Background and Facts

Respondent was the elected Clerk-Treasurer of the Town of…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of GutmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In the Matter of: Thomas R. PhilpotIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API