Legal Opinion

Matter of Riddle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1998No. 13S00-9704-DI-255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Today we find that the respondent, the duly-elected prosecutor of Crawford County, Indiana, engaged in acts constituting ghost employment by hiring a lawyer as chief deputy prosecuting attorney of that county, assigning no prosecutorial duties or responsibilities to that person, and using the state statutory salary for that position to compensate that person for working in the respondent’s private law office. As such, the conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law and warrants the respondent’s disbarment.

This disciplinary action commenced with…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Matter of EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Matter of GutmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Matter of HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Matter of CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MearsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In the Matter of Dwayne M. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In the Matter of Charles P. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In the Matter of Thomas E. Q. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In the Matter of Thomas E. Q. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API