Marchese v. Norristown Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
A nuisance may be merely a right thing in the wrong place — like a pig in the parlor instead of the barnyard.1 Legally speaking, no nuisance is involved here; instead, this is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County affirming the Norris-*87town Zoning Boai*d of Adjustment and bolding Joseph Márchese, the owner-appellant, had lost his right as a nonconforming user by reason of abandonment. Plainly speaking, the objectionable creature here is a one-story garage, forty-five feet by sixty feet, used for the storage and minor maintenance of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Best v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Jacobs v. Mishawaka Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Smith v. Board of Zoning AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Dandy Co. v. Civil City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority v. Hempfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.