Legal Opinion

Best v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1958No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

In this appeal we are .called upon to determine the constitutionality of the single-family dwelling provision of the Pittsburgh zoning ordinance as applied to the property of the appellant.

The appellant, Pauline G. Best, is the owner of a home at 1008 Morewood Avenue, Pittsburgh, which contains twenty-two rooms and seven baths. The property is located in a “C” zoned district of the city and may be used only as a single-family dwelling. Within 200 feet of the home is a district in which multiple-unit dwellings are permitted. In 1950 the appellant applied for a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. R. v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API