Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Van Sant v. City of Everett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 3, 1993No. 28049-0-IPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

The City of Everett appeals the Superior Court's reversal and remand of an Everett hearing examiner's decision. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Facts

Respondent Craig Van Sant filed an application for a nonconforming use permit for property located at 4228 South Third in Everett. Such permits are governed by provisions of former Everett Municipal Code chapter 19.56. Everett's director of planning and community development granted Van Sant a certification of nonconforming commercial and multifamily use on October 26,1989, allowing automobile detailing on the main floor and three…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Lige & Wm. B. Dickson Co. v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Abbenhaus v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. PA Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Washington Public Employees Ass'n v. Washington Personnel Resources BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API