Legal Opinion

Davis v. De Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1970PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoldman, P. J.

In March, 1965 one De Frank, a prospective purchaser, was permitted by Monroe Auto Sales Corporation (Monroe) to test-drive one of its Mercedes-Benz automobiles. In the course of the test-drive, De Frank, who had three passengers in the car, collided with another vehicle. The jury determined that the accident was the result of the negligence of De Frank. The passengers and the other driver were injured and have secured verdicts totaling $16,598 against De Frank and Monroe. The parties stipulated that the cross claim by Monroe against De Frank, and the question of insurance coverage, should be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. ClamorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  5. Faltersack v. Vanden BoogaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChappellMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Horace Mann Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Rao v. Universal Underwriters, Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Southern Home Insurance v. WilloughbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API