T.P.D. v. A.C.D.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case involves a paternity disestablishment action. Although appellant (Tom)1 is not the biological father of nine-year-old Allie, the superior court held that he is her legal father by operation of the doctrine of laches. Tom’s appeal presents the question whether a parental relationship may be established by laches. The cross-appeal presented by CSED on its own behalf and on behalf of Alice, Tom’s former wife and Allie’s mother, challenges the court’s conclusion that Allie was aware that Tom was not her biological father; CSED therefore…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Schumacher v. City and Borough of YakutatAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- H.P.A. v. S.C.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Brown v. ElyAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. StraneAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Ray v. RayAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Estate of Himsel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.