Legal Opinion

AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 29, 2018No. 3:09-cv-30181Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ANGIODYNAMICS, INC., ) Plaintiff , ) ) ) v. ) C.A. NO. 09-cv-30181-MAP ) BIOLITEC AG, ) WOLFGANG NEUBERGER, ) BIOLITEC, INC., and ) BIOMED TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, ) LTD., ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 37; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXPENSES; AND PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER MOTION FOR RULE 37 SANCTIONS (Dkt. Nos. 522, 622, and 639) March 29, 2018 PONSOR, U.S.D.J. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff has filed three motions seeking various sanctions for Defendants’ deliberate refusal to comply with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  5. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API