Legal Opinion
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 11, 2015No. 13-1626, 13-2179PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
This is a companion case to AngioDynamics v. Biolitec AG, No. 14-1603. In this appeal, Defendants argue that the district court exceeded the bounds of its authority when it issued civil contempt sanctions after Defendants violated the court’s preliminary injunction order. Defendants also aver that the district court should have vacated the underlying preliminary injunction. We affirm.
I. Facts & Background
This court previously set out the basic factual contours of this case in AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG, 711 F.3d 248 (1st Cir.2013) (per curiam). Plaintiff…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bazarian International Financial Associates, LLC v. Desarrolloa Aerohotelco, C.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Rodriguez-Miranda v. BeninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Amadi v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- U-Nest Holdings, Inc. v. Ascensus Coll. Sav. Rk'ing Svcs.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.