Legal Opinion
Minnegren v. Nozar
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 2016No. B264219PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHMANN-GERST, Acting P. J.
A jury concluded that respondent Joshua B. Nozar (Nozar) was not negligent in connection with a two-car collision in which appellant Sassa Minnegren (Minnegren) was injured. Minnegren appeals from the judgment, contending that the special verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court erred when it denied her motion for new trial. She also appeals from the denial of her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV).
In essence, Minnegren asks us to take the verdict away from the jury and determine the evidence established that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Conroy v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Acqua Vista Homeowners Assn. v. MWI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hart v. Darwish, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Buell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Morgan v. Davidson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hart v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.