Legal Opinion
United States v. Shissler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 14, 1934No. 13803PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLY, District Judge.
Complainants have filed their bill of complaint in which they seek an injunction restraining defendants from distributing, selling, marketing, or handling milk or cream for consumption in the Chicago Sales Area and have moved the court to issue a preliminary injunction so restraining the defendants.
In their bill of complaint plaintiffs allege that in accordance with the United States statute known as the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 USCA §§ 601-619), and the General Regulations, Agricultural Adjustment Administration, Series 4, Revision 1, promulgated by the Secretary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Midland Cooperative Wholesale v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Royal Farms Dairy, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
- United States v. Canfield Lumber Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1934