Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1946PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFFIRMED. REHEARING DENIED. This suit was instituted by the State of Oregon on the relation of E.L. Peterson, as director of the State Department of Agriculture, to enjoin the defendant, A.L. Martin, from selling fluid milk to the general public within the city of Sheridan, Oregon, without being licensed as a milk dealer under the provisions of the Oregon Milk Control Act (sections 34-1001 to 34-1018, O.C.L.A., as amended by chapter 120, Or. L. 1943). The complaint, by appropriate allegations, charged the defendant with repeated, persistent and intentional violations of the Act in that regard.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. State Board of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State of Oregon v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API