Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kelly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1938No. Appeal, 156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal by Clement Kelly from the judgment and sentence following his conviction of having broken and entered the drug store of Herman Finkelstein, by night and with intent to steal, is based solely upon alleged errors in the charge of the trial judge.

Counsel for appellant has summarized his ten assignments of error under the following statement of “Questions Involved:”

“1. Was the charge of the court on reasonable doubt to the effect that if the jury cannot form a conscientious conclusion in their own minds that the defendant is guilty, their duty is to acquit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. StabinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. BarrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sharpe v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth v. SaldutteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Commonwealth v. Healey, Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. BozziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. HradeskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API