Commonwealth v. Kelly
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
This appeal by Clement Kelly from the judgment and sentence following his conviction of having broken and entered the drug store of Herman Finkelstein, by night and with intent to steal, is based solely upon alleged errors in the charge of the trial judge.
Counsel for appellant has summarized his ten assignments of error under the following statement of “Questions Involved:”
“1. Was the charge of the court on reasonable doubt to the effect that if the jury cannot form a conscientious conclusion in their own minds that the defendant is guilty, their duty is to acquit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. StabinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. BarrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sharpe v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. SaldutteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. Healey, Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. BozziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. HradeskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.