Commonwealth v. Saldutte
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The appellant, Eugene Saldutte, was indicted, tried and convicted of breaking and entering the shop or store of one Andrew Kramer, with intent to commit a felony.
His main ground for reversing the judgment is that the evidence identifying him as one of the men who broke into Kramer’s shop or store in the early morning of March 31, 1938, was not sufficient in quantity or certainty to support his conviction. There is no merit in the position.
Andrew Kramer, who conducts a confectionery store in Library, Allegheny County, Pa., was awakened about 2:30 o’clock in the morning…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. EppsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. GoetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. LindnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Melot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. HoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.