Commonwealth v. Hradesky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
Frank Hradesky and James Pauli were indicted for attempted extortion, attempted bribery, and conspiracy to commit extortion and bribery. In addition, Hradesky was charged with misconduct in office. Pauli entered a plea of guilty to the charges against him, and became a witness for the Commonwealth at the trial of Hradesky, who was found guilty by a jury. He was sentenced by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Fayette .County. On this appeal from judgment and sentence he does, not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain Ms conviction, but alleges that certain…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. NeillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. DarcySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Commonwealth v. ThurmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- United States v. StironeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. RicciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. StaudenmayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. O'KickiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.