Legal Opinion

Ryan Consol. Petroleum Corp. v. Pickens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1954No. 6704PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

In the opening paragraph of appellant’s brief, it makes the following statement of the nature of the suit, which is concurred in by appellees:

“This is a suit for equitable relief against the confiscation of its property and property .rights instituted by Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Ryan, as the owner of ⅞ oil, gas and mineral leasehold interest in ⅚ of the minerals underlying lots 12 and 13, against W. L. Pickens and H. H. Coffield, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Pickens and Coffield, owners of a ⅞ oil, gas and mineral leasehold…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corp. v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MecomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Rainwater v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXASTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Atlantic Refining Co. v. RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXASTexas Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API