Legal Opinion

Keegan v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1946No. 11514PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge. -

Patrick Keegan brought this suit against the Humble Oil and Refining Company to recover an undivided interest in a seventeen acre tract of land, a part of Lot 7 of a subdivision of the north half of the Thomas Choate League in Harris County, Texas. The complaint alleged record title in the plaintiff, that Humble was a trespasser without title, and prayed for judgment vesting in Keegan an undivided one-sixth interest to the land.

Humble in response to the complaint filed a motion for an order of the court to require plaintiff to bring in certain named parties who it was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Starlie Lomayaktewa v. Stanley K. Hathaway, and Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. Hudson v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API