Juen v. Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtGrover, J.
*975Defendants appeal from an order denying their motions to compel arbitration, arguing that the trial court erred by finding no enforceable arbitration agreement. We will affirm the order. For the reasons stated here, defendants have failed to show through custom and habit evidence that the broker had initialed the arbitration clause on the original residential listing agreement, or that the defendant realtor had assented to arbitration through other conduct.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff engaged Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc. (Pinel) to sell his Danville home in 2008. In 2015 he filed a putative class…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. GainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Brookwood v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Brockman v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Chuc v. City Fibers CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Fabian v. Renovate America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.