Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Board, which reversed a referee’s opinion and order and reinstated the employer’s denial of compensability. The issue is whether claimant’s injury is work-related. We reverse and remand for acceptance of the claim.
Claimant is a salaried paralegal employed by a law firm. She is expected to document at least fifteen hundred billable hours per year. The law firm is located on the fourteenth floor of a Portland office building, which has a third floor cafeteria primarily maintained for, and patronized by, the building’s tenants. Although claimant is not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by20 opinions
- Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Proctor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- First Interstate Bank v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Preston v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- SAIF Corp. v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.