Legal Opinion

Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 17, 1985No. 83-00058; CA A31485PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Board, which reversed a referee’s opinion and order and reinstated the employer’s denial of compensability. The issue is whether claimant’s injury is work-related. We reverse and remand for acceptance of the claim.

Claimant is a salaried paralegal employed by a law firm. She is expected to document at least fifteen hundred billable hours per year. The law firm is located on the fourteenth floor of a Portland office building, which has a third floor cafeteria primarily maintained for, and patronized by, the building’s tenants. Although claimant is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Proctor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. First Interstate Bank v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Preston v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. SAIF Corp. v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API