Heymach v. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard M. Klein, J.
The issue before the court is whether plaintiff’s State law tort claims are preempted by Federal law.
*585In 1976, Congress enacted the Medical Device Amendments to, in the words of the statute’s preamble, “provide for the safety and effectiveness of medical devices intended for human use.” (Pub L 94-295, 90 US Stat 539 [MDA].)
The case at bar presents the question whether a premarket approval (PMA) granted under the Federal Medical Device Amendments preempts a State common-law negligence action against the manufacturer of an allegedly defective pacemaker.
The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Expressway Village, Inc. v. Denman, New York County Courts2009
- LaManna v. CarriganCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Gallego v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Richard R. v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2017