Legal Opinion

Heymach v. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard M. Klein, J.

The issue before the court is whether plaintiff’s State law tort claims are preempted by Federal law.

*585In 1976, Congress enacted the Medical Device Amendments to, in the words of the statute’s preamble, “provide for the safety and effectiveness of medical devices intended for human use.” (Pub L 94-295, 90 US Stat 539 [MDA].)

The case at bar presents the question whether a premarket approval (PMA) granted under the Federal Medical Device Amendments preempts a State common-law negligence action against the manufacturer of an allegedly defective pacemaker.

The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Expressway Village, Inc. v. Denman, New York County Courts2009
  3. LaManna v. CarriganCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  4. Gallego v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  5. Richard R. v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API