Legal Opinion
LaManna v. Carrigan
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided May 15, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eric N. Vitaliano, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment. The relevant facts *99are not in dispute. The complaint alleges that plaintiff Christopher G. LaManna was injured as a result of an accident which occurred when the New York City bus he was driving was struck by a car owned by defendant Kim Panzo that was being operated by defendant Franklin Carrigan. Maria LaManna, the plaintiff’s wife, sues also for the loss of services.
A little more than a month before the accident, on November 10, 1998, the plaintiffs filed a petition in bankruptcy, under chapter 7 of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re: Daryl Lee Vote, Debtor. Wayne Drewes, as Bankruptcy Trustee v. Daryl Lee VoteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rivera v. Ndola Pharmacy Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Best v. MetLife Auto & Home InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2004