Legal Opinion

Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 9, 1994No. 93-1911PublishedCited by 227 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

In this products liability action against the manufacturer of an allegedly defective pacemaker, plaintiff-appellant, Ellen Mendes, appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Med-tronic, Inc. The district court entered summary judgment for Medtronic, ruling that the express preemption clause of the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a), preempted plaintiffs Massachusetts common law claims. 1 We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

Congress enacted the MDA to give the Food and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by227 opinions

  1. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Robert B. Grenier v. Vermont Log Buildings, Inc., Third-Party v. Dap, Inc. And Champion International Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. In Re Lupron® Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  4. PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Subby MARTELLO, Appellant, v. CIBA VISION CORPORATION, a Georgia Corporation, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API