Crook v. Russell
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
Robert Crook appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court, Oxford County, following a non-jury trial. Crook brought suit to recover overtime compensa tion and liquidated damages under 26 M.R. S.A. §§ 626 and 664 (Supp.1986) against Isaac Russell, the owner and operator of Russell’s Ambulance Service in Norway for whom Crook formerly worked as an EMT. The trial justice found for Russell. Crook maintains on appeal that the trial justice’s findings are clearly erroneous. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Since 1970, Russell has owned and operated Russell’s Ambulance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- John A. Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- C.M. Rousseau, Jr. v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Blackmer v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooper v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Gould v. A-1 Auto, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Leeber v. Deltona Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019