Legal Opinion
Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Services, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 21, 2019No. Docket: Cum-18-288PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.
[¶1] Sydney A. TerMorshuizen and Patricia A. TerMorshuizen appeal from a summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Horton, J. ) in favor of Spurwink Services, Inc. (Spurwink) on the TerMorshuizens' claim for overtime pay pursuant to 26 M.R.S. § 664 (2018). In this appeal we consider whether interruptions to "sleep time" are compensable under section 664. The TerMorshuizens contend that the court erred in considering analogous federal law and in concluding that Spurwink's sleep time policy was reasonable as a matter of law. We affirm the court's judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beal v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Paul Remmes v. The Mark Travel CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Rainey v. LangenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Danielle Sullivan v. St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and ResidenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Gordon v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BRADFORD v. NAPLES CAUSEWAY DEVELOPMENT LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- Gary Williams v. Unum Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019