Legal Opinion
Gould v. A-1 Auto, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 8, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.
[¶ 1] David Gould appeals from an amended judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Androscoggin County, Gorman, J.) in which the court reconsidered its original judgment in his favor and entered an amended judgment in favor of A-l Auto, Inc. Gould argues that the court erred in failing to credit his testimony as to the amount of overtime he worked, in incorrectly calculating the overtime pay he is due, and in its reasoning in the amended judgment. We agree in part and vacate the amended judgment and remand to the trial court for recalculation of overtime pay.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] David Gould…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Advanced Construction Corp. v. PileckiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Arsenault v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Miele v. MieleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Giguere v. Port Resources Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Homeward Residential, Inc. v. GregorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Lewiston DMEP IXSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- In re Involuntary Commitment of M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Homeward Residential, Inc. v. GregorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.