Rhine v. City of McKinney
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Collin. Tried below before the Hon. R. R. Gaines. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Bonner, Associate Justice.
The city of McKinney having condemned part of the homestead property of appellant Rhine for the purpose of opening a street within the corporate limits, under sec. 130, general incorporation act, approved March 15, 1875 (Laws second session 14th Leg., 150, re-enacted by Revised Statutes, art. 478), he sued out an injunction to restrain further proceedings, which on motion was dissolved. Rhine not desiring that his petition be continued over for further hearing as an original bill, the same was dismissed, and this appeal taken.
At a former term the previous submission…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Lumsden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by13 opinions
- Armstrong v. Traylor and ElmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Wilkins v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Security Mortgage & Trust Co. v. CaruthersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Sullivan v. Roach-Manigan Paving Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Gulf, Colorado & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.