Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Traylor and Elmore

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1895No. 275PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Questions Certified from Court of Civil Appeals for First District, in an appeal from San Jacinto County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWH, Associate Justice.

The following statement and questions are submitted to this court by the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District:

“The suit was brought by appellant, William Armstrong, in a Justice Court of San Jacinto County, against the appellees, J. H. Traylor and Emma Elmore, to recover of them a certain hog, or its value, $25, alleged to be wrongfully withheld from his possession by the defendants. Defendants answered, admitting the possession of plaintiff’s hog, but that they were rightfully in possession thereof, because it had been impounded and sold by virtue of the law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. . NearingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Campbell v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Grover v. HuckinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Rhine v. City of McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Campau v. LangleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lock v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Mabee v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Thompson v. Tobacco Root Co-Op. State Grazing DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Riggins v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Vogt v. Bexar CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API