Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. Ellis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1888No. 2462PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Burleson. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This suit involves mainly the same questions presented in that of this appellant against J. C. Rowland, this day decided. The counsel are the same in the two cases, and recognizing the fact that many of the same points are presented by the two appeals, they have submitted them together. The facts were admitted, and are substantially alike in both cases, with this exception, that in the former the ■crossing was demanded in Rowland’s inclosure, and in the present case the demand was for a crossing on appellee’s land ■at a point outside of any inclosure.

We are of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Bost'n and A.R.R. Co. v. . Vil. of Greenb'shNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Rhine v. City of McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Johnson v. Freeport & Mississippi River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Old Colony & Fall River Railroad v. Inhabitants of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1859

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CastellawTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Milam CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Vogt v. Bexar CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Ry. Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Houston &. T. C. Ry. Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API