Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Roach-Manigan Paving Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1920No. 6351PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; R. B. Minor, Judge. Action by the Roach-Manigan Paving Company of Texas against D. J. Sullivan. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MOURSUND, X

We adopt appellant’s statement of the nature and result of the suit, with some slight changes:

This was a suit filed by appellee against appellant upon special assessment street paving certificates, wherein appellee recovered judgment.

The amended original petition for cause of action alleged substantially: That the city of San Antonio had by a majority vote of the taxpayers of said city adopted the provisions of the act of the Legislature of 1909 brought forward as chapter 11, tit. 22, of the Revised Civil Statutes; that the said city had passed appropriate ordinances for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hutcheson v. StorrieTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. City of Paris v. O.N. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. McNeil v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Herring v. City of MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Farmers' State Bank of BurkburNett v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Vogel v. Central Texas Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API