Ewa Plantation Co. v. Wilder
Hawaii Supreme Court
Submissions Upon Agreed Statements oe Fact.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
COKE, C. J.'
These two causes are here on original submissions containing agreed statements of fact—a proceeding authorized by section 2381 R. L. 1915 as amended by Act 82 S. L. 1921. The questions involved in both cases are in all material respects parallel and will therefore be consolidated and discussed in a single opinion but a separate judgment will be entered in each proceeding con-formably to the decision. The two plaintiffs above named, to wit, Ewa Plantation Company and Hawaiian Sugar Company, are domestic corporations and the defendant Charles T. Wilder is the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Carter v. HillHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
- Re Income Taxes E.J. LordHawaii Supreme Court · 1933
- Carter v. HillHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
- Hawaiian Canneries Co. v. Dependents of KaliHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.